<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Butterfly Effect &#187; Berlei</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/tag/berlei/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>Creating shiny girls . . .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does size matter?</title>
		<link>http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/2008/10/08/does-size-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/2008/10/08/does-size-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danni Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Body Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berlei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Higgins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sizing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest post by Enlighten&#8217;s Program Manager for South Australia, Jane Higgins

An article in the Adelaide&#8217;s Advertiser on Saturday 20th September, 2008 sparked my interest.
Apparently a review of the Australian Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industries was released this week by the Federal Industry Minister, Kim Carr. The review recommend that $5 million be put towards developing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/files/2008/07/jane.jpg"></a><a href="http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/files/2008/09/754301_hips_dont_lie.jpg"></a>Guest post by <a href="http://www.enlighteneducation.com/pages/meet-our-team/south-australia.php">Enlighten&#8217;s Program Manager for South Australia, Jane Higgins</a></p>
<p><a href="http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/files/2008/07/jane.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-279" src="http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/files/2008/07/jane.jpg" alt="" width="152" height="203" /></a></p>
<p>An article in the Adelaide&#8217;s Advertiser on Saturday 20th September, 2008 sparked my interest.</p>
<p>Apparently a review of the Australian Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industries was released this week by the Federal Industry Minister, Kim Carr. The review recommend that $5 million be put towards developing a &#8220;consistent Australian sizing standard.&#8221; They argue that women are frustrated by the discrepancy in sizing in different stores. Being a size16 myself, I find I can range in size anywhere from a 14 &#8211; 20 and it is annoying to be at the mercy of a label&#8217;s decision of how to size their garments!</p>
<p>What is astounding, is that our clothing sizing has been based on the American research conducted by Berlei in 1926.</p>
<p>So much has changed since then including the size, lifestyle and habits of women. A <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23483789-5012694,00.html">National Size and Shape survey conducted by Henneberg and Veitch in 2004 </a>involved taking 65 individual measurements from 1300 women and 100 men across the country, and was backed up by a study of 5000 people. It found that women today are up to 20% heavier than they were when the Berlei survey was done. Shock horror!! <strong>The average measurements of an Australian woman in the regular size range is now a 92cm bust, 74cm waist and 99cm hips, which fit a size 16 on the current Standards Australia garment rating.</strong> Further they found that the average woman in Adelaide was 77kg, and the women in Brisbane, 73kg. <a href="http://www.sharpdummies.com.au/pdf/Curvy%20Media%20Release3.pdf">In fact Veitch goes onto say that 50% of Australian Women are not catered for with the present sizings </a>.</p>
<p>According to this research, I am finally normal!!!! Will wonders never cease??!!</p>
<p>Some critics of the present sizings suggest we use numbers 1-5 as a new way of identifying our appropriate sizing. This week I went to a fashion parade of a big women&#8217;s label that uses S, M, L but being a 16 is equal to a Small in their range. As a mature woman I have a different body shape to a 20 year old woman who is also a size 16. My boobs are saggier, my tummy is flabbier and I have fat stored in places I never knew existed.</p>
<p>Attempting to buy up to date fashion in my size is incredibility difficult. But my solution has always been to buy most of my wardrobe from op shops. What fun I have finding that barging that reflects who I am in an individual way. I am also aware that this constant buying is not only placing stress on our bank balances, our sense of ourselves but also the environment. <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23080874-7583,00.html">Apparently it takes about 2700 litres of water to make one cotton T-shirt!!!!!!!!!!!</a></p>
<p>Another issue worth considering is the impact our &#8220;passion for fashion&#8221; may be having on the environment. A report from the Council of Textiles and Fashion Industries found we are becoming a nation that <a href="http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,26278,24054980-5007185,00.html">considers clothing to be disposable </a>. It showed that in 2007, women under 30 bought 102 items of clothing a year, double that of women over 30. There are now concerns on where these cheap clothes go after women decide the garment&#8217;s use-by date is up. Fuelling the high turnover of clothing is the new wave of fast-fashion stores that produce cheaper clothes flooding into stores every week.</p>
<p>Our worth cannot be measured by an arbiturary size. I am more than my size 16 &#8211; much bolder, bigger and fuller than a number could ever reflect! If a new sizing standard is to be introduced it must consider women of all ages, shapes and sizes &#8211; not just the antiquated cardboard cutouts from the past.</p>
<p>Now &#8230; I must write to Federal Industry Minister, Kim Carr and let him know I would develop a National sizing Standard for $4.9 million!!!</p>
<p>With love<br />
Jane</p>
<p> <a href="http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/files/2008/09/754301_hips_dont_lie.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-308" src="http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/files/2008/09/754301_hips_dont_lie.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fenlighteneducation.edublogs.org%2F2008%2F10%2F08%2Fdoes-size-matter%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Does+size+matter%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://enlighteneducation.edublogs.org/2008/10/08/does-size-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
